<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slipstream Installation of SharePoint 2007 Beta-2TR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.robgarrett.com/2006/10/03/slipstream-installation-of-sharepoint-2007-beta-2tr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.robgarrett.com/2006/10/03/slipstream-installation-of-sharepoint-2007-beta-2tr/</link>
	<description>Software and Technology Tid-bits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wwvine</title>
		<link>http://blog.robgarrett.com/2006/10/03/slipstream-installation-of-sharepoint-2007-beta-2tr/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wwvine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/cs/blogs/software/archive/2006/10/03/Slipstream-Installation-of-SharePoint-2007-Beta_2D00_2TR.aspx#comment-532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Workflow Foundation Beta 2.2

Rob,

Noted in your blog, Steve Smith&#039;s v3 beta 2TR &quot;how to&quot; and Joris Poelmans blog http://jopx.blogspot.com/2006/09/installing-wss-30-beta2-tr-slipstream.html that NONE OF YOU suggest using Windows Workflow Foundation beta 2.2 during the installation of the bits prior to running the configuration wizard.

MS expressly states that&#039;s they way to do it??

I&#039;ve had 2 semi-successful installs following that procedure.... and recently &quot;a lot&quot; of failures.

I&#039;m going to try going straight to .net 3.0 RC1 but I am still interested in knowing how you are able to bypass the presence of WWF beta 2.2? I tried it that way one time and the bits would not install.

Thanks,
Mark]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Workflow Foundation Beta 2.2</p>
<p>Rob,</p>
<p>Noted in your blog, Steve Smith&#8217;s v3 beta 2TR &#8220;how to&#8221; and Joris Poelmans blog <a href="http://jopx.blogspot.com/2006/09/installing-wss-30-beta2-tr-slipstream.html" rel="nofollow">http://jopx.blogspot.com/2006/09/installing-wss-30-beta2-tr-slipstream.html</a> that NONE OF YOU suggest using Windows Workflow Foundation beta 2.2 during the installation of the bits prior to running the configuration wizard.</p>
<p>MS expressly states that&#8217;s they way to do it??</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had 2 semi-successful installs following that procedure&#8230;. and recently &#8220;a lot&#8221; of failures.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to try going straight to .net 3.0 RC1 but I am still interested in knowing how you are able to bypass the presence of WWF beta 2.2? I tried it that way one time and the bits would not install.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

